Skip to main content
Stanford's Materials Engineering program costs just $12,136 after aid while maintaining a 92.8% graduation rate, making it one of the most surprising values in higher education. This stark contrast highlights how need-based aid can transform accessibility at elite institutions. Public options like University of Florida deliver strong value at $6,351 net cost with strong 91.5% completion rates. The western states dominate this affordable market, with California schools like UC Irvine and UC Merced offering solid pathways into a field where graduates earn between $61,303 and $70,680. Materials engineers find strong demand across aerospace, semiconductor, and renewable energy sectors, particularly in tech hubs like Seattle and Silicon Valley. New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology provides specialized training in extractive industries at $8,265, reflecting the state's mining heritage. The data reveals significant regional variations, from Connecticut's multiple campus options to Georgia Tech's balance of affordability and academic strength at $13,289.
47
Programs
$6,351 – $19,813
Net Price Range
$65,472
Avg. Program Earnings
74.0%
Avg. Graduation Rate

47 Materials Engineering Programs

Program rankings
# School Net Price In-State Tuition Graduation Rate Acceptance Rate
1 $6,351 $6,381 91.5% 23.4%
2 $8,265 $9,058 56.4% 74.4%
3 $8,896 $17,462 59.5% 97.9%
4 $10,650 $6,368 75.1% 41.0%
5 $11,504 $17,462 56.7% 97.4%
6 $12,136 $62,484 92.8% 3.7%
7 $12,744 $14,167 69.1% 89.5%
8 $12,840 $14,237 86.0% 21.2%
9 $13,172 $9,315 63.9% 89.1%
10 $13,289 $11,764 92.3% 17.1%
11 $13,339 $17,452 65.4% 97.3%
12 $13,485 $12,643 83.7% 47.5%
13 $13,670 $12,051 67.8% 89.8%
14 $13,707 $14,170 76.6% 68.7%
15 $13,741 $7,992 64.7% 76.7%
16 $13,782 $8,816 60.9% 73.9%
17 $13,945 $9,992 83.1% 52.7%
18 $14,013 $13,747 92.7% 8.6%
19 $14,059 $17,472 56.9% 92.2%
20 $14,352 $11,164 59.6% 79.1%
21 $14,401 $12,997 61.6% 83.1%
22 $14,832 $17,228 93.2% 17.7%
23 $15,201 $16,004 84.9% 44.8%
24 $15,216 $11,188 45.9% 95.2%
25 $15,288 $15,247 85.1% 37.3%
26 $15,402 $8,994 62.4% 85.6%
27 $15,590 $11,505 88.6% 44.6%
28 $15,624 $11,075 85.2% 30.4%
29 $15,729 $18,392 68.7% 93.7%
30 $16,177 $10,020 51.2% 86.3%
31 $16,438 $11,450 56.2% 87.7%
32 $16,928 $11,205 89.3% 49.1%
33 $16,931 $8,895 84.6% 47.2%
34 $16,948 $9,277 67.6% 76.6%
35 $17,139 $16,488 84.8% 74.9%
36 $17,218 $13,212 69.9% 94.9%
37 $17,727 $8,832 62.4% 86.7%
38 $18,109 $13,484 73.5% 68.4%
39 $18,148 $10,498 60.9% 73.8%
40 $18,161 $63,340 94.6% 7.3%
41 $18,165 $10,497 75.5% 90.2%
42 $18,292 $12,859 87.7% 52.7%
43 $18,486 $10,408 63.9% 67.9%
44 $18,902 $63,255 93.2% 2.7%
45 $19,182 $8,782 61.9% 83.9%
46 $19,353 $51,763 72.4% 61.4%
47 $19,813 $60,156 96.1% 4.0%

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Stanford compare to public schools for Materials Engineering affordability?

Stanford's $12,136 net cost places it surprisingly close to many public options, costing only $5,785 more than University of Florida. The private university's generous financial aid brings costs below schools like University of Washington at $13,485. Stanford also delivers a 92.8% graduation rate compared to the 56-92% range at public institutions. This demonstrates how elite private schools can become accessible through need-based aid programs.

What explains the wide graduation rate gap between similar-cost programs?

Graduation rates vary dramatically from New Mexico Tech's 56.4% to Stanford's 92.8%, despite relatively close net costs. University of Connecticut's regional campuses show 56-65% completion rates at $8,896-$13,339, while UC schools maintain 69-86% rates. This spread often reflects different admission standards, student preparation levels, and institutional support systems. Schools with higher acceptance rates like UC Merced (89.46%) typically see lower completion rates than selective programs.

Does geographic location affect Materials Engineering earning potential significantly?

Washington graduates earn $70,680 compared to $61,303 in Connecticut, showing notable regional differences. Arizona State graduates earn $66,821 while Georgia Tech alumni make $65,387, reflecting local industry demand. The West Coast premium likely stems from aerospace and semiconductor industries requiring advanced materials expertise. These $9,000+ earning differences can justify higher program costs over a career spanning decades in materials development.

Is debt load manageable at these affordable Materials Engineering programs?

Student debt remains reasonable across most programs, with UC Irvine graduates owing just $7,500 compared to early career earnings of $61,000+. Georgia Tech students graduate with $16,936 in debt while earning $65,387, creating favorable debt-to-income ratios. University of Washington debt of $19,485 represents less than 28% of starting salaries at $70,680. Connecticut campuses show higher $27,000 debt loads but still maintain manageable ratios given Materials Engineering career prospects.

Where do acceptance rates create the best admission opportunities?

Connecticut regional campuses offer 97%+ acceptance rates while maintaining solid career outcomes at $61,303 earnings. New Mexico Tech accepts 74.43% of applicants compared to Stanford's highly selective 3.68% rate. Arizona State (89.75%) and University of Utah (89.13%) provide accessible entry points into Materials Engineering. These higher acceptance rates allow students to enter the field without competing for extremely limited spots at the most selective programs.

Net price reflects the average cost after grants and scholarships for first-time, full-time students. See our methodology for details.