Skip to main content
CUNY Hunter College stands out with the lowest net cost at $2,446, delivering Geography and Cartography education for less than many students spend on textbooks. This dramatic affordability comes at the expense of earnings potential, with graduates earning $19,227 compared to University of North Carolina at Charlotte's $46,869. The $44,423 earnings gap between these programs illustrates how location and institutional resources shape career outcomes in spatial sciences. Geography and cartography professionals find growing opportunities across the Northeast corridor, where federal agencies like NOAA and private firms increasingly rely on geographic information systems for urban planning and environmental monitoring. California dominates this value ranking with four CSU campuses, reflecting the state's leadership in geospatial technology and environmental science industries. Students can expect net costs ranging from Hunter's $2,446 to UNC Charlotte's $14,745, while graduation rates vary significantly from Indiana University-Southeast's 33.40% to University of Florida's impressive 91.50%. The field benefits from rising demand for geographic data analysis in climate research, urban development, and digital mapping technologies that power everything from ride-sharing apps to disaster response systems.
50
Programs
$2,446 – $17,883
Net Price Range
$36,729
Avg. Program Earnings
63.6%
Avg. Graduation Rate

50 Geography and Cartography Programs

Program rankings
# School Net Price Program Earnings In-State Tuition Graduation Rate Acceptance Rate
1 $4,113 $33,993 $6,813 52.6% 86.9%
2 $2,446 $19,227 $7,382 61.0% 47.9%
3 $4,702 $35,954 $3,876 77.7% 64.6%
4 $6,480 $39,009 $6,980 54.8% 95.4%
5 $6,351 $35,954 $6,381 91.5% 23.4%
6 $5,646 $28,309 $7,073 69.2% 66.7%
7 $8,896 $41,565 $17,462 59.5% 97.9%
8 $6,747 $29,685 $8,147 52.2% 78.1%
9 $8,257 $32,569 $8,179 33.4% 85.2%
10 $7,599 $28,366 $7,095 56.2% 91.2%
11 $11,504 $41,565 $17,462 56.7% 97.4%
12 $12,909 $44,189 $12,700 49.6% 70.7%
13 $13,091 $42,682 $8,353 47.2% 96.1%
14 $11,024 $35,060 $11,990 54.0% 95.7%
15 $14,745 $46,869 $7,214 67.7% 79.6%
16 $10,043 $31,839 $6,410 74.6% 43.9%
17 $8,931 $27,874 $7,008 69.9% 40.0%
18 $13,339 $41,565 $17,452 65.4% 97.3%
19 $10,916 $33,993 $11,436 53.7% 97.0%
20 $11,408 $35,420 $10,449 53.9% 82.9%
21 $14,979 $46,087 $14,850 92.9% 11.3%
22 $13,696 $41,789 $12,922 55.0% 97.5%
23 $15,402 $46,087 $8,994 62.4% 85.6%
24 $14,922 $44,384 $12,652 56.9% 80.0%
25 $10,512 $31,133 $7,602 55.8% 93.2%
26 $14,059 $41,565 $17,472 56.9% 92.2%
27 $10,170 $29,685 $7,593 57.9% 91.9%
28 $13,670 $39,832 $12,051 67.8% 89.8%
29 $13,181 $38,289 $12,186 62.6% 72.8%
30 $14,352 $40,537 $11,164 59.6% 79.1%
31 $14,170 $38,289 $12,262 44.4% 95.1%
32 $13,485 $36,164 $12,643 83.7% 47.5%
33 $14,013 $37,208 $13,747 92.7% 8.6%
34 $14,487 $37,671 $6,496 82.2% 66.7%
35 $13,172 $33,993 $9,315 63.9% 89.1%
36 $13,816 $35,420 $11,180 87.2% 42.6%
37 $15,590 $39,832 $11,505 88.6% 44.6%
38 $10,997 $28,055 $5,656 83.0% 25.0%
39 $16,791 $42,682 $11,306 67.6% 78.6%
40 $14,785 $37,208 $8,250 64.3% 82.4%
41 $16,972 $42,682 $5,786 48.1% 67.9%
42 $14,485 $36,312 $10,117 46.9% 95.3%
43 $14,715 $36,560 $9,192 49.9% 93.5%
44 $13,825 $33,993 $14,965 85.3% 25.9%
45 $16,640 $40,647 $12,286 49.6% 93.3%
46 $15,794 $38,289 $9,950 49.9% 85.3%
47 $11,877 $28,598 $10,791 52.9% 80.6%
48 $14,714 $35,416 $8,606 60.9% 84.5%
49 $12,437 $29,685 $49,834 79.2% 61.2%
50 $17,883 $42,682 $10,942 70.5% 95.1%

Frequently Asked Questions

What explains the massive earnings difference between the highest and lowest paying programs?

UNC Charlotte graduates earn $46,869 while CUNY Hunter College graduates earn $19,227, creating a $27,642 gap that reflects regional job markets and program focus. Charlotte's location in a growing metropolitan area with strong banking and logistics sectors provides more high-paying opportunities for geospatial professionals. Hunter College's urban setting offers different advantages but typically lower starting salaries. The 67.70% graduation rate at UNC Charlotte also suggests stronger program completion support.

How do California State Universities compare for geography value?

Four CSU campuses make this list with net costs between $4,113 and $7,599, offering consistent affordability across the state. CSU Fresno leads in earnings at $39,009 despite a 95.43% acceptance rate, while CSU Northridge graduates earn $28,366 with the lowest debt at $12,500. CSU Los Angeles provides the best overall value with $4,113 net cost and $33,993 earnings. All four maintain graduation rates above 50%, reflecting solid program quality across the system.

Does University of Florida justify its competitive admission requirements?

University of Florida accepts only 23.35% of applicants but delivers a 91.50% graduation rate, the highest among these programs. Graduates earn $35,954 with relatively low debt of $16,407, creating strong return on investment despite the selective admissions. The $6,351 net cost remains reasonable for such outcomes. The online version offers similar earnings with 77.70% graduation rate and even lower net cost at $4,702.

Where can students find the most affordable geography programs?

CUNY Hunter College offers the lowest net cost at $2,446, followed by University of Florida-Online at $4,702 and CSU Los Angeles at $4,113. These three programs provide access for under $5,000 annually. Hunter College's $7,382 in-state tuition reflects New York's support for public education, while Florida's online option eliminates many campus-based expenses. California's low community college transfer rates help keep CSU costs manageable for geography majors.

What graduation rate patterns emerge across these geography programs?

Graduation rates span from Indiana University-Southeast's concerning 33.40% to University of Florida's strong 91.50%. Programs with rates above 60% include Hunter College (61.00%), UF-Online (77.70%), CSU Fullerton (69.20%), and UNC Charlotte (67.70%). Schools with higher net costs don't always correlate with better completion rates, as CSU Fresno achieves 54.80% graduation despite 95.43% acceptance. The wide variation suggests significant differences in student support and program rigor.

Net price reflects the average cost after grants and scholarships for first-time, full-time students. See our methodology for details.