Skip to main content
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology delivers the lowest net cost at $8,265 while producing graduates earning $75,204, creating one of the strongest value propositions in petroleum engineering education. The $20,000+ cost difference between top public programs like New Mexico Tech and Texas A&M reflects significant variations in state funding and regional economics. Texas dominates this field with four programs, directly serving the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale regions where major operators like ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips maintain extensive operations. Net costs range from $8,265 to $29,240 across these programs, while graduate earnings span $60,099 to $92,124, showing that affordable education can still lead to six-figure starting salaries. The acceptance rates vary dramatically, from Texas Austin's selective 31% to Wyoming's accessible 96%, giving students multiple pathways into this specialized field that supplies engineers for America's largest oil and gas producing regions.
24
Programs
$3,061 – $29,240
Net Price Range
$75,451
Avg. Program Earnings
63.3%
Avg. Graduation Rate

24 Petroleum Engineering Programs

Program rankings
# School Net Price Program Earnings In-State Tuition Graduation Rate Acceptance Rate
1 $9,144 $87,532 $10,904 43.0% 94.7%
2 $8,265 $75,204 $9,058 56.4% 74.4%
3 $9,634 $75,889 $8,640 36.7%
4 $11,779 $73,949 $6,938 59.8% 96.0%
5 $13,773 $72,214 $14,278 63.6% 81.5%
6 $17,413 $91,017 $9,595 75.3% 72.9%
7 $13,853 $67,380 $9,711 64.9% 66.2%
8 $16,240 $78,343 $8,050 58.1% 89.5%
9 $12,997 $61,303 $9,648 61.2% 88.4%
10 $19,678 $88,723 $11,678 87.6% 31.4%
11 $20,924 $92,124 $13,099 83.8% 62.7%
12 $14,118 $61,888 $10,418 52.0% 74.6%
13 $20,071 $83,325 $11,852 67.5% 67.3%
14 $18,372 $71,575 $38,974 58.1% 82.9%
15 $18,998 $72,762 $10,951 63.3% 83.3%
16 $17,365 $63,005 $11,700 68.8% 87.8%
17 $23,678 $80,022 $48,602 73.3% 69.2%
18 $20,015 $60,099 $11,954 71.0% 75.7%
19 $29,240 $77,213 $21,186 79.4% 58.0%
20 $10,204 $9,892 45.6% 96.6%
21 $3,061 $7,846 48.9% 47.9%
22 $19,524 $10,507 65.9% 74.3%
23 $19,173 $41,720 72.8% 73.1%
24 $15,501 $9,815 62.9% 75.2%

Frequently Asked Questions

What petroleum engineering program offers the best cost-to-earnings ratio?

New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology provides strong value with a net cost of $8,265 and graduate earnings of $75,204, creating a 9:1 earnings-to-cost ratio. Texas A&M leads in graduate earnings at $92,124 but costs $20,924 net, resulting in a 4.4:1 ratio. University of Oklahoma graduates earn $91,017 with a net cost of $17,413, producing a 5.2:1 ratio that ranks second overall.

How do public and private petroleum engineering costs compare?

Marietta College represents the only private option at $18,372 net cost, falling in the middle range of public programs rather than commanding the typical private premium. Public in-state tuition ranges from Wyoming's $6,938 to Texas A&M's $13,099, showing substantial state-by-state variations. The $38,974 sticker price at Marietta demonstrates how private aid packages can bring costs closer to public levels.

Does acceptance rate correlate with program quality in petroleum engineering?

Texas Austin combines the lowest acceptance rate at 31% with strong earnings of $88,723 and an 88% graduation rate, suggesting selectivity can indicate quality. However, Wyoming maintains a 96% acceptance rate while producing graduates earning $73,949, proving accessible programs can deliver solid outcomes. New Mexico Tech accepts 74% of applicants yet achieves the best value ratio in the field.

What regional advantages do Texas petroleum engineering programs offer?

Four Texas programs appear in this ranking, reflecting the state's position as America's top oil producer with 40% of national output. Texas graduates earn between $67,380 and $92,124, with direct access to Permian Basin operations and Houston's energy corridor. The concentration of programs from $9,144 to $20,924 net cost provides options across different budget levels while maintaining proximity to industry employers.

Where do petroleum engineering graduates accumulate the least debt?

Texas Austin graduates carry just $17,239 in debt while earning $88,723, creating the most favorable debt-to-income ratio at 19%. Texas A&M follows with $18,969 debt against $92,124 earnings, representing a 21% debt-to-income ratio. Louisiana Lafayette offers the lowest debt at $20,500, though earnings of $61,888 result in a 33% debt-to-income ratio.

Net price reflects the average cost after grants and scholarships for first-time, full-time students. See our methodology for details.