17 Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering Programs
| # | School | Net Price | In-State Tuition | Graduation Rate | Acceptance Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute of Technology
Boston, Massachusetts
|
$16,172 | $18,906 | 47.2% | |
| 2 |
Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts
|
$16,816 | $59,076 | 97.3% | 3.2% |
| 3 |
Eastern Nazarene College
Quincy, Massachusetts
|
$17,733 | $28,610 | 35.3% | 61.9% |
| 4 |
University of Massachusetts-Boston
Boston, Massachusetts
|
$18,282 | $15,496 | 51.1% | 80.8% |
| 5 |
University of Massachusetts-Lowell
Lowell, Massachusetts
|
$18,627 | $16,570 | 70.1% | 86.0% |
| 6 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts
|
$19,813 | $60,156 | 96.1% | 4.0% |
| 7 |
Franklin W Olin College of Engineering
Needham, Massachusetts
|
$20,575 | $64,458 | 92.2% | 19.1% |
| 8 |
University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth
North Dartmouth, Massachusetts
|
$20,605 | $15,208 | 49.0% | 95.5% |
| 9 |
University of Massachusetts-Amherst
Amherst, Massachusetts
|
$23,691 | $17,357 | 83.2% | 63.5% |
| 10 |
Boston University
Boston, Massachusetts
|
$26,996 | $65,168 | 90.0% | 14.4% |
| 11 |
Stonehill College
Easton, Massachusetts
|
$29,969 | $54,500 | 80.8% | 73.4% |
| 12 |
Western New England University
Springfield, Massachusetts
|
$31,170 | $46,430 | 63.9% | 88.0% |
| 13 |
Northeastern University
Boston, Massachusetts
|
$32,116 | $63,141 | 90.4% | 6.8% |
| 14 |
Wentworth Institute of Technology
Boston, Massachusetts
|
$34,170 | $41,010 | 68.6% | 92.3% |
| 15 |
Tufts University
Medford, Massachusetts
|
$35,435 | $67,844 | 93.3% | 9.7% |
| 16 |
Merrimack College
North Andover, Massachusetts
|
$37,899 | $51,786 | 72.1% | 74.6% |
| 17 |
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Worcester, Massachusetts
|
$43,273 | $59,070 | 88.4% | 57.5% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How do public and private net costs compare for electrical engineering in Massachusetts?
Public universities average around $19,000 in net costs, with UMass-Dartmouth at $20,605 and UMass-Boston at $18,282. Private institutions show extreme variation, from Harvard's need-based $16,816 to Tufts at $35,435. The four UMass campuses maintain consistent affordability while private schools depend heavily on financial aid packages. Elite privates often match public costs through generous aid, while mid-tier privates typically cost $10,000-15,000 more annually.
What earnings can graduates expect from the most affordable programs?
UMass-Dartmouth graduates earn $63,997 at the lowest salary range, while UMass-Lowell reaches $69,338 for similar net costs around $18,000-20,000. MIT tops all programs at $121,226, nearly double other schools. Even affordable options like UMass-Amherst produce $69,338 earners at $23,691 net cost. The 47% salary premium from elite schools may not justify the debt load for many students.
Does acceptance rate correlate with program affordability in Massachusetts?
The most selective programs often provide the lowest net costs through generous aid, with MIT at 3.96% acceptance and $19,813 net cost. UMass-Dartmouth accepts 95.52% of applicants while maintaining $20,605 affordability. Mid-range selectivity schools like Northeastern (6.80% acceptance) charge $32,116 net. The pattern suggests that either highly selective aid-rich schools or open-access public universities offer the best value propositions.
Where do graduation rates stand among the most affordable options?
Public universities show mixed results, with UMass-Amherst achieving 83.20% graduation rates and UMass-Boston at 51.10%. The most affordable option, Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute, graduates 47.20% of students at $16,172 net cost. Private schools consistently exceed 80% graduation rates but cost significantly more. Students balancing affordability with completion odds should consider UMass-Lowell's 70.10% rate at reasonable $18,627 cost.
More Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering Rankings
Related
Net price reflects the average cost after grants and scholarships for first-time, full-time students. See our methodology for details.