Skip to main content
Texas A&M University-Central Texas delivers marketing education for just $1,113 net annually, making it the most affordable option among major programs nationwide. This remarkable accessibility contrasts sharply with private alternatives that can cost four times more, yet graduates across all price points earn between $23,340 and $51,829 starting salaries. The South and Southwest regions drive much of this affordability trend, with Texas schools particularly benefiting from state funding and proximity to major corporate headquarters in Dallas, Houston, and Austin that actively recruit marketing talent. Public institutions dominate the affordable market, though their graduation rates vary significantly from Ohio University-Lancaster's 13.7% to the University of Florida's strong 91.5%. California State University-San Bernardino exemplifies the sweet spot many students seek, combining a reasonable $5,918 net cost with solid career outcomes and a 54.7% graduation rate in one of the nation's largest consumer markets.
50
Programs
$1,113 – $8,931
Net Price Range
$35,466
Avg. Program Earnings
41.1%
Avg. Graduation Rate

50 Marketing Programs

Program rankings
# School Net Price In-State Tuition Graduation Rate Acceptance Rate
1 $1,113 $6,627 95.7%
2 $3,659 $7,064 46.9% 89.1%
3 $4,285 $5,986 37.9% 80.4%
4 $4,503 $6,178 20.0%
5 $4,694 $3,283 29.6%
6 $4,734 $7,358 30.3% 59.1%
7 $5,328 $6,178 19.3%
8 $5,458 $3,148 26.8%
9 $5,732 $8,054 56.2%
10 $5,918 $7,675 54.7% 91.1%
11 $5,971 $6,178 17.7%
12 $6,007 $7,001 25.6% 45.0%
13 $6,133 $6,178 13.7%
14 $6,351 $6,381 91.5% 23.4%
15 $6,352 $7,200 33.3% 74.2%
16 $6,392 $5,966 36.7%
17 $6,480 $6,980 54.8% 95.4%
18 $6,483 $6,178 12.1%
19 $6,500 $9,859 49.3% 87.7%
20 $6,507 $5,324 52.5% 51.6%
21 $6,747 $8,147 52.2% 78.1%
22 $7,131 $4,656 55.1% 95.6%
23 $7,168 $10,896 48.3% 86.0%
24 $7,349 $14,776 16.0% 45.1%
25 $7,455 $5,354 50.6% 54.0%
26 $7,559 $6,920 31.1%
27 $7,563 $5,612 28.6% 96.9%
28 $7,569 $6,920 36.4%
29 $7,599 $7,095 56.2% 91.2%
30 $7,607 $5,542 38.7% 45.7%
31 $7,668 $6,920 30.2%
32 $7,669 $21,290 61.3% 21.1%
33 $7,912 $7,868 34.9%
34 $8,001 $4,879 64.3% 81.3%
35 $8,036 $5,580 35.4% 33.3%
36 $8,130 $7,327 33.2% 88.9%
37 $8,142 $5,954 47.7% 76.8%
38 $8,155 $6,360 61.8% 48.0%
39 $8,245 $5,580 43.1% 52.8%
40 $8,264 $6,238 42.1% 99.8%
41 $8,327 $8,942 48.7% 96.9%
42 $8,463 $8,419 44.0% 72.8%
43 $8,463 $6,270 40.7%
44 $8,624 $7,499 26.5% 82.1%
45 $8,683 $5,498 25.2%
46 $8,783 $5,580 33.0% 33.8%
47 $8,787 $5,580 32.9% 44.7%
48 $8,837 $26,892 59.1% 75.4%
49 $8,896 $17,462 59.5% 97.9%
50 $8,931 $7,008 69.9% 40.0%

Frequently Asked Questions

What explains the massive cost difference between the cheapest and most expensive affordable marketing programs?

Texas A&M University-Central Texas charges just $1,113 net annually while some programs reach $6,507, reflecting different state funding models and regional economics. Public universities typically offer lower costs through taxpayer support, with Texas and California leading in affordability due to large state appropriations. Private institutions like Universidad Central de Bayamon at $4,285 net cost often provide competitive aid packages to match public pricing. The $5,394 gap between cheapest and most expensive represents different value propositions rather than quality differences.

How do graduation rates correlate with program costs in affordable marketing degrees?

The data reveals no clear relationship between cost and completion rates among affordable programs. Ohio University-Lancaster costs $6,133 but graduates only 13.7% of students, while the University of Florida charges $6,351 and achieves a 91.5% graduation rate. California State University-San Bernardino demonstrates the middle ground with $5,918 costs and 54.7% completion. Regional campus locations often show lower graduation rates regardless of price, suggesting student support services matter more than tuition levels.

Where do marketing graduates from these affordable programs typically find employment?

Graduates enter regional job markets that vary significantly by location and economic base. Texas graduates benefit from corporate headquarters in major cities, while California programs feed into the entertainment, technology, and consumer goods sectors. Ohio regional campuses serve manufacturing and healthcare marketing needs, explaining the $23,416 average debt load across multiple campuses. The earnings range of $23,340 to $51,829 reflects these regional market differences, with urban areas typically offering higher starting salaries.

Is the University of Florida worth the higher cost compared to other affordable options?

At $6,351 net cost, Florida sits at the top of the affordable range but delivers strong outcomes with $51,829 starting earnings and 91.5% graduation rates. This represents the highest earning potential in the dataset, making the additional cost worthwhile for students who gain admission to its selective 23.35% acceptance rate. The earning premium of nearly $25,000 over some alternatives easily justifies the moderate cost increase. Students must weigh admission difficulty against long-term financial returns.

Does attending a regional campus affect marketing career prospects compared to main campuses?

Regional campuses often struggle with lower graduation rates, as seen with Ohio University's satellite locations achieving 13.7% to 20% completion rates compared to main campus norms. However, they provide local access and networking opportunities within specific markets that can benefit career development. Students save significantly on living costs while building connections in smaller metropolitan areas. The trade-off involves fewer on-campus resources and alumni networks versus affordability and regional employer relationships that regional campuses cultivate.

Net price reflects the average cost after grants and scholarships for first-time, full-time students. See our methodology for details.