Skip to main content
South Carolina's most affordable legal studies programs reveal a striking $13,682 gap between the cheapest and most expensive options. Lander University leads at just $14,501 net cost, while Anderson University commands $28,183 despite both offering similar coursework. The state's growing legal sector, particularly around automotive manufacturing disputes and tourism-related litigation, creates demand for paralegals and legal assistants who often start with general legal studies backgrounds.
6
Programs
$14,501 – $28,183
Net Price Range
51.7%
Avg. Graduation Rate

6 Non-Professional General Legal Studies (Undergraduate) Programs

Program rankings
# School Net Price In-State Tuition Graduation Rate Acceptance Rate
1 $14,501 $11,700 48.8% 67.4%
2 $17,529 $23,400 69.6%
3 $20,351 $30,050 44.4% 75.3%
4 $20,415 $27,500 27.6% 89.5%
5 $21,955 $31,030 48.6% 86.8%
6 $28,183 $33,580 71.0% 45.4%

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes Lander University's legal studies program so affordable compared to others?

Lander University benefits from public funding and in-state tuition of just $11,700, creating a net cost of $14,501 after aid. Private colleges like Anderson University charge $33,580 in tuition, nearly triple Lander's base rate, even though both programs prepare students for similar entry-level legal careers.

How do graduation rates vary among South Carolina's cheapest legal studies programs?

Anderson University achieves the highest graduation rate at 71%, while Limestone University struggles with just 27.6% of students completing their degrees. The middle-range schools like Bob Jones University (69.6%) and Charleston Southern (48.6%) show that cost doesn't always correlate with completion rates.

Does acceptance rate indicate program quality for legal studies in South Carolina?

Anderson University maintains the most selective admissions at 45.39% acceptance, while Limestone accepts 89.47% of applicants. However, Bob Jones University combines selective admissions (67.4%) with strong graduation rates, suggesting that moderate selectivity may balance accessibility with student success better than extremely open enrollment.

Net price reflects the average cost after grants and scholarships for first-time, full-time students. See our methodology for details.